| AUGUST
2005 Special Education:
Every Teacher’s Responsibility
All California Teachers Need Professional
Development and On-the-Job Support to Teach Special Education Students
In a previous edition of CenterView (August
2004) we described how California’s growing population of
special education students is held to the same high standards of
achievement as their general education peers even though there is
a significant shortage of credentialed special education teachers.
The problem is particularly troublesome in schools serving high
proportions of poor and minority students.
Here, we continue that discussion of special education
by examining the professional development and support that teachers
receive to help them effectively work with students with special
needs. With the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), the federal government has reiterated
its emphasis on improving the academic achievement of special education
students by standardizing the means by which special education teachers
can become designated as “highly qualified,” and by
mandating professional development for both general and special
education teachers.
It is clear that changes in professional development
aimed at improving special education instruction are needed. A recent
survey commissioned by the Center for the Future of Teaching and
Learning and conducted by SRI International found that while the
vast majority of California teachers have special education students
in their classrooms, many teachers report they do not have the training
and support they need to meet the needs of these students.1 This
disparity is troubling given that on average, special education
students in California spend almost three-quarters (73%) of their
instructional time in a general education classroom.2
Under state and federal law, these students are expected to participate
in the state’s assessment system and, as a group, show adequate
progress towards meeting the state’s academic standards. Virtually
all teachers need the skill and knowledge to work with students
with special needs. Unfortunately, many general education teachers
report that they are not well prepared to work effectively with
special education students in the classroom, especially those trained
before current preparation standards were adopted in 2001 when special
education training for general educators was strengthened. Making
matters worse, most teachers do not receive much on-the-job support
or professional development in special education.
The Challenge of Reaching the Teachers of Special
Needs Students
In the survey of California teachers described above,
88% of all respondents reported having special education students
in their classes. Of those teachers, only 30% indicated “having
adequate training on special modifications or accommodations to
use with [special education] students.” Teachers reported
a lack of other supports as well (see figure). Only 69% reported
having access to students’ Individualized Education Plans
(students’ instructional plans, designed in concert with parents,
teachers, and special education staff, which should be accessible
to all teachers who have special education students in their classrooms),
and only 68% reported having access to a resource teacher. Far fewer
(23%) had special materials or equipment (such as books on tape
and computer software) to use with special education students, and
only 16% had access to high-quality resources (e.g. appropriate
textbooks) for special education students.
Special education teachers face additional challenges.
In case studies conducted for the Center for the Future of Teaching
and Learning, special education teachers reported that they often
felt isolated from their general education peers and excluded from
school-wide reform efforts. Some reported overwhelming instructional
challenges, such as how to incorporate grade-level standards into
instruction for students at vastly different levels. In many schools,
special education teachers lacked adequate access to and support
from speech therapists, school psychologists, school nurses, and
classroom aides, making it difficult or impossible to fully address
the diverse needs of their students.
Few Funding Sources, Limited Reach
It is clear that both general and special education
teachers need high-quality on-the-job support and training to help
them better meet the needs of their special education students.
However, in California, funding specifically dedicated to support
and training for teaching special needs students is very limited.
There are some federal funds which can be used for
professional development in special education for special education
teachers as well as general education teachers. For example, Title
II funds can be used to train teachers of special needs students.
There are also formula-based funds allocated to states as part of
IDEA that can be spent on professional development; however these
funds have limited reach at only $3.3 million for the entire state.
About $2.5 million of these funds are distributed to the Special
Education Local Plan Areas (SELPAs)—consortia of districts
and county offices of education that coordinate special education
programs and services—and the remainder is spent by the state
on training and technical assistance activities. California has
also received a competitive State Improvement Grant (SIG) which
funds technical assistance and various training activities in seven
core areas for special education teachers, but again, it is a modest
effort funded at only $2.1 million per year for three years. Though
perhaps high-quality and successful in their own right, these efforts
as a whole do not appear sufficient enough to substantially impact
the California teacher workforce. Two-thirds of all teachers surveyed
reported that their professional development contributed only a
little or not at all to their ability to adapt instruction for special
education students.
The Center View
By failing to support and sustain a cohesive teacher
development system that targets the needs of all teachers, including
those serving special education students, California is falling
short of ensuring that these students have adequate and equitable
opportunities for educational success. Further, the state is at
risk of failing to meet the intent of the No Child Left Behind Act,
which specifically states that professional development should provide
teachers with instruction in methods of teaching children with special
needs.
In recent years, California has begun to move in
the right direction by including special education teachers in a
few major reform efforts, such as the Beginning Teacher Support
and Assessment system (BTSA) and Reading First. But there is more
to be done—much more. For example, the state should immediately:
- Revise the “Standards for the Teaching Profession”
to better align with what teachers should know and be able to
do to work successfully with special education students. Training
models and manuals incorporating these standards should be developed
using the familiar and successful format the California Department
of Education and the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing
designed for working with beginning teachers.
- Establish mentor teacher resource lists at each SELPA in order
to match underprepared teachers with support providers experienced
in the field of special education. First priority should be given
to matching underprepared teachers with mentors drawn from special
education within each district or, if no mentors were available
within the district, the county or SELPA region.
- Include the percentage of underprepared, intern, and novice
special education teachers in reports on the make-up of the teacher
workforce. Make these data publicly available via the School Accountability
Report Card (SARC), and staffing reports on the CDE Web site (e.g.
DataQuest; Ed-Data).
The No Child Left Behind Act requires that professional
development give teachers “the knowledge and skills to provide
students with the opportunity to meet challenging State academic
content standards and student academic achievement standards.”
The Act states further that professional development activities
“should be of high quality, sustained, intensive and classroom-focused
in order to have a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction
and the teacher’s performance in the classroom.” Certainly
with regard to professional development in the area of special education,
the voices of California’s teachers align with these NCLB
requirements.
|