California's teaching force  
more information
background
references
moving forward
key issues
 

Description
First authorized by the Teacher Education Internship Act of 1967, internship programs provide many uncredentialed teachers with structured coursework while they maintain a job as a salaried district employee and teacher of record for one or more classes. The Hughes-Hart Education Reform Act of 1983 (SB 813) allowed districts to create and implement their own internship programs; therefore, prospective teachers wishing to complete an internship program currently may do so through a district or an institute of higher education (IHE). Additionally, legislation in 2002 (SB 2029, Alarcon) allows district internship programs approved by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CCTC) to offer intern certificates in all areas of special education. Internship programs generally begin with a summer session or other preservice workshops that provide an introduction to teaching. Over the course of one or two years, interns take seminars and coursework while working as a teacher of record. Many programs provide additional support via an experienced teacher who acts as a mentor or coach.

Funding
The Alternative Certification Act of 1993 (AB 1161, Quackenbush) legislated funding criteria for the district and university internship programs. The 2000–01 budget increased the reimbursement rate to districts and IHEs to $2,500 per intern. Since AB 1161, funding for intern programs has increased dramatically from $2 million to more than $30 million per year. SB 1666 (Alarcon, 2000) allows the intern program funds, also known as the alternative certification funds, to be spent on the preintern program as needed. In 2000–01, the combined funds of the preintern and intern programs reached $43.6 million. In 2002–03, the state budget authorized $25.6 million for alternative certification programs, a 19 percent drop from the previous year.

Intern Funding and Participation

Fiscal Year
Number of Programs Funded
Number of Interns Served
Number of Districts Involved
Funding (in millions)
1994–95
29
1,238
150
$2.0
1995–96
23
1,471
178
$2.0
1996–97
23
1,888
186
$2.0*
1997–98
52
3,706
271
$4.5*
1998–99
58
4,340
330
$6.5*
1999–2000
65
4,827
408
$11.0*
2000–01
75
5,649
465
$21.5*
2001–02
82
7,146
637
$31.8*
2002–03
$25.6
*Plus carryover.

Participation
Since 1994–95, internship programs have maintained a steady growth in number of participants in more than half of California’s school districts. Participation in district and university internship programs grew more than 450 percent from 1,228 in 1994–95 to 7,146 in 2001–02. Preliminary numbers show that intern participation rates may increase to more than 8,500 in 2002–03. Intern programs initially were targeted at those prospective teachers who could not afford the costs of traditional preparation programs and those willing to work in districts with shortages of fully credentialed teachers. Legislation in 2001 (SB 57, Scott) sought to also attract private school teachers to internship programs by allowing them (along with district interns) to get through the internship program more quickly.

Evaluations
The Legislature has mandated several evaluations of the state’s intern program. The most comprehensive reports to the Legislature occurred when the intern program was still relatively small, in 1987, 1992 and 1996. A study in 1999 focused solely on Los Angeles Unified School District’s intern program for special education teachers. Annual reports to the Legislature by CCTC staff provide data on participant characteristics and retention. The Office of Educational Research and Improvement recently funded an independent evaluation of California’s internship programs; this study is in its initial stages.

Additional Resources