California's teaching force  
more information
background
references
moving forward
key issues
 

Description
Reading First is the name of the federal program outlined in Title I, Part B of the No Child Left Behind Act, the 2002 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. As of fall 2002, California has submitted and received approval of the state plan for Reading First. The plan includes subgrants to districts as well as funding for a state-level Reading Development Center and regional Reading Implementation Centers, as described below. AB 65 (Strom-Martin, 2002) formally establishes the Reading First Plan and authorizes spending for it.

Subgrants to Local Education Agencies (LEAs)
Reading First subgrants to local education agencies (LEAs) are aimed at improving reading of students in grades K–3, as well as special education students in all grades. Subgrants to districts can be spent to provide teachers with training that is specific to their grade level and the instructional program that their school has adopted and to purchase reading materials. K–3 teachers and special education teachers with students in grades K–12 are eligible for training. To participate, K–8 schools must be using state-adopted instructional materials in reading and in the first year must train teachers through a reading Professional Development Institute or an AB 466 state-approved training provider and administrators through an AB 75 provider.

As part of Reading First, the Governor has convened a Reading Leadership Team “to ensure an integrated approach to improving K–3 reading instruction and raising K–3 reading achievement statewide.” Reading First is to become the foundation for the California Department of Education’s “statewide infrastructure for improvement of early literacy.”

Reading Development Center and Reading Implementation Centers (RICs)
In summer 2002, in conjunction with the Reading First plan, a Reading Development Center was established at the state level, and seven Reading Implementation Centers (RICs) were established at county offices of education. The RICs, along with six additional “lead agencies,” will receive Reading First funds to provide technical assistance to LEAs as they implement and maintain their Reading First efforts. All RICs are approved to be AB 466 trainers and will be supported with AB 466 money as well as Reading First money.

Funding
Subgrants to LEAs
Districts will receive $6,500 per eligible teacher in each qualifying school. According to California’s Reading First application, this will support professional development costs (estimated at $1,000 for each teacher stipend and $1,500 per teacher in training costs), purchase of assessment materials, purchase of reading materials and other costs such as paying reading coaches.

Districts may spend these funds in the entire district, beyond just the qualifying schools. California has $131.6 million to spend on Reading First in 2002–03 and a projected $871 million over the next six years. In 2002–03, about $125 million will go to subgrants to eligible districts, beginning in fall 2002. Given the typical cost of $2,500 per teacher, approximately $48 million of Reading First funds might be spent on professional development.

RICs
AB 65 allocates $5 million to the RICs and an additional $1.4 million to the six regional lead agencies that also will provide technical assistance to LEAs implementing Reading First.

Participation
For each district that receives a competitively based Reading First subgrant, the state will fund half of its schools. Federal Reading First legislation requires that funds go to schools with the highest numbers or percentages of K–3 students reading below grade level and that are identified as needing improvement and serving children in poverty.

At $6,500 per teacher, the $125 million in 2002–03 LEA subgrants covers more than 19,000 teachers. However, because districts may spend funds in a flexible way, more teachers are likely to be impacted by the Reading First program funds.

Evaluation
The Reading First plan includes evaluation efforts at the local, state and national levels. LEAs are required to do internal evaluations including progress made on LEA-determined benchmarks. A state-contracted evaluation of the program statewide will examine, among other things, impacts on student test scores in reading. In addition, there will be a national evaluation of the Reading First program.

Additional Resources