Press Releases
Press Releases

Embargoed for Release:
December 7, 2005 6:00 a.m. 

Contact: John McDonald
(310) 798-3252 – (310) 880-5332 (cell)
John.mcdonald@stonesthro.com

New Report Raises Warning Over Assignment of Least Prepared Teachers and
Resurgent Teacher Shortage in a High Stakes Education Environment

(Sacramento) With the help of teachers entering the profession as interns California has reduced the number of underprepared teachers by half, but the vast majority of intern teachers are assigned to low achieving schools serving poor and minority students, according to a new two-year study of teaching in California released today by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.  The report also warns that the state is facing a shortage of tens of thousands of teachers within the next decade.

The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 reveals a serious maldistribution of teaching interns. According to the report, eighty-five percent of new teachers who enter the classroom as interns are assigned to schools where more than sixty percent of the students are minorities.  Only three percent of intern teachers work in schools with few minority students.

“The least prepared, least experienced teachers are assigned to schools serving primarily African American and Latino children, many of them from poor families,” said Margaret Gaston, Director of the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. The chronic assignment of the least prepared teachers to certain groups of students raises serious questions about the equity and fairness of the state’s effort to resolve its teacher shortage.

According to the U.S. Department of Education, whether or not a state is making a good faith effort to reach the highly qualified teacher goals of NCLB will be determined, in part, by examining “the steps taken to ensure that experienced and qualified teachers are equitably distributed among classrooms with poor and minority children and those with their peers.”

“The findings of this report make clear that to resolve the teacher shortage and address the inequities in teacher assignment, California’s policymakers must put into place a permanent system that reliably delivers fully qualified and effective teachers to every classroom.  By acting now, the state can take a strong step toward reaching the rapidly approaching deadline to meet the requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act,” Gaston added.

The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 also warns of a building teacher shortage at a time when the state is challenged to meet high-stakes federal requirements. California will need to replace at least 100,000 teachers, a full one-third of the teacher workforce, as baby boomer teachers retire over the next ten years. These retirements, along with declining enrollment in teacher preparation programs, are projected to boost California’s teacher shortage back up to approximately 27,000 teachers as soon as the 2007-08 school year, and to nearly 33,000 teachers by 2014-15.

“According to the No Child Left Behind Act, all students are required to be proficient in reading and math by 2014.  But we project that California will be short tens of thousands of teachers just as the stakes for students and schools will be the highest,” said Patrick Shields, Director of the Center for Education Policy at SRI International and the principal researcher for the report. “Unfortunately, it is exactly the kids who are most in need of an experienced teacher that are the least likely to get one, a prospect the coming teacher shortage will only increase.”

The report notes that students in schools measured as the lowest achieving by the state’s academic performance index (API) are five times more likely to face underprepared teachers than students in the highest performing schools, and are far more likely to face a string of underprepared teachers.

 “For 6th graders in California’s lowest-achieving schools, the odds of having had more than one underprepared teacher are three in ten; for 6th graders in the highest achieving schools, the odds drop to one in fifty,” said Gaston. 

“California does not have an adequate teacher pipeline in place to provide a constant supply of fully prepared and effective teachers to every school,” said Harvey Hunt, Senior Policy Advisor to the Center. “Without one, it’s hard to see how we will meet the needs of students or the requirements of NCLB. The state’s policymakers urgently need to begin a new conversation about how to ensure that all California students have the teachers they need and deserve.”

The report's call for involvement of California's policy leaders in strengthening the teaching profession has been taken up in the State Senate.  Under the leadership of President Pro Tem Don Perata, Senator Jack Scott (D-Pasadena), chair of the Senate Education Committee, is already developing omnibus legislation to address the issues in the report.

With research by SRI International, The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 provides the latest available data and analysis of California’s teaching workforce. Key findings include:

The least experienced teachers are assigned to schools serving poor and minority students

  • Eighty-five percent of teachers working as interns are assigned to schools where 61-100 percent of the students are minorities. The majority of intern teachers (53%) are assigned to schools where virtually all (91-100%) of students are minorities. Only 3 percent of interns work in schools where minorities make up 0-30 percent of the student population.
  • Seventy percent of intern teachers are assigned to schools where 51-100 percent of the students receive free or reduced-price lunch.
  • In schools with the most minority students (91-100%), 22 percent of special education teachers are underprepared, while 6 percent of special education teachers are underprepared in schools with the smallest minority populations (0-30%).

Students in low achieving schools are the most likely to have the least prepared teachers

  • In California’s lowest achieving schools, the odds of today’s sixth graders having had one underprepared teacher is 4 in 10, and the odds of having had more than one underprepared teacher are 3 in 10.  In the highest achieving schools, today’s sixth graders have had a 2 in 10 chance of having and underprepared teacher, and only a 1 in 50 chance of having more than one underprepared teacher.

A looming teacher shortage

  • California has reduced the number of underprepared teachers, from a high of over 42,000 in 2000-01, to around 20,000 in 2004-05. 
  • But California is facing a new teacher shortage.  One-third (97,000 teachers) of the teaching force is expected to retire within the next ten years.
  • Enrollment in teacher credentialing programs has declined over the past 2 years, dropping 4% (from approximately 76,000 to 73,000) in 2002-03 and another 8% (from approximately 73,000 to 67,500) in 2003-04.
  • The state may face a shortage of approximately 27,000 teachers as soon as 2007-08 and is projected to face a shortage of nearly 33,000 fully credentialed teachers by the mid- 2010s.
  • The state must also deal with the current shortage: 24% of English teachers are underprepared or teaching out-of-field.  The same is also true for 25% of math teachers, 23% of social studies teachers, 22% of life science teachers, and 30% of physical science teachers.

California is at risk of failing to meet the academic needs of students, the requirements of No Child Left Behind and the Williams settlement agreement

Beginning in June 2006, California high school students will have to pass the California High School Exit Exam in order to graduate, but the students least likely to pass the test also have the teachers least prepared to help them.

  • On average, in schools with the lowest achievement on the mathematics section of the California High School Exit Exam, 26 percent of teachers are underprepared and/or novice.  On average, only 14 percent of teachers in the highest performing schools are underprepared and/or novice.
  • 1.6 million students in California are designated as English learners. California requires that teachers with one or more students designated as English learners be authorized to teach them.  But more than half (over 100,000) of the state’s veteran teachers with more than five years experience lack such authorization.

No Child Left Behind requires all students to achieve proficiency in mathematics and English by 2014, but student achievement in California remains very low, particularly for minority students.

  • In 2005, well under half of California’s students scored at the proficient or advanced levels in English (40%) or mathematics (38%) on the California Standards Test.
  • Only 32 percent of Latino, and 28 percent of African American fifth-graders scored at a proficient level or better on the state’s math test.

No Child Left Behind requires that every teacher in the state be “highly qualified” by the end of 2005-06, but thousands of teachers do not meet the requirements, threatening California’s ability to be in full compliance by the end of the 2005-06 school year. And the number may grow.

  • Ten thousand California teachers did not meet the “highly qualified” requirements of NCLB in 2004-05. Those teachers also do not meet the requirements of the Williams settlement agreement.
  • The projected shortage of teachers may once again mean that more non-NCLB-compliant teachers will still need to be employed—as many as 19,000 in 2014-15.  

The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 is a project of the Center of the Future of Teaching and Learning.  The full report with recommendations and summary materials are available on the Center’s website at www.cftl.org.

 

<- Back to Press Releases

Contact Information:
All press inquiries should be directed to: John McDonald, Stone’s Throw Communications • (310) 798-3252 or (310) 880-5332 • Email: john.mcdonald@stonesthro.com

 

Home | Introduction to CFTL | Board of Directors | Funders | Mission Statement | Contact Us | Press Room | Links
What's New | Initiatives | Data | Publications
© 2005 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning • Phone: (831) 427-3628 Fax: (831) 427-1612 • Privacy Policy | Terms of Use